An uninspired and forgettable movie: Sharks of the Corn

Wiki Article

Are you ready to take an adventure through shark-infested fields of corn? Take a seat because "Sharks of the Corn" is ready to bring you an enthralling mix of terror and comedy. It was written and directed by the famous Tim Ritter, this ultra budget film draws inspiration from Stephen King's masterpiece "Children of the Corn" (1984) and transforms it into a funny and weird comedy that'll leave you thinking about it and squatting on the ground laughing.

A Cornfield Carnival of Chaos

From the beginning of an apparently innocent corn field "Sharks of the Corn" introduces its quirky nature. We are introduced to Gary and Susan the two main characters, who gradually fade out of the picture with the film taking towards unexpected direction. The story weaves horror components with lots of plots and subplots. Together, they create an enthralling recipe that can only be described as a carnival in the cornfield filled with chaos.

A Socially Psychopathic Shark Enthusiast

Then there's Teddy Bo Lucas, a name that gives an added twist to an already awe-inspiring plot. The psychotic shark enthusiast is a bizarre fascination with these marine predators. Just as if the sight of sharks in fields weren't interesting enough, Teddy extends his fascination another level when there's a shocking crime in his hotel room. The twist that is unexpected sets the stage for a wild ride of intrigue and mystery.

Confused, Cults, and Sharks

The plot thickens as the authorities ascribe the blame to Gary, a poor Gary to be the culprit in Susan's death, yet despite the lack of motive. While a shark-related cult emerges as a peculiar subplot, introducing us to one where the cornfields and the cult of sharks collide. Just when you think you're not getting much more insane it turns out that two thieves are determined to take a shark pup from the community. The film is a tangled mix of funny and scary that will keep an audience engaged.

Critiques and Comic Relief

Although "Sharks of the Corn" provides an original and refreshing entertainment, it's certainly not without its faults. The movie often switches between distinct characters and scenes that can cause viewers to be confused and trying to figure out the numerous plotlines. It's a deliberate decision in terms of design that adds to the spoof kind of film but it may not be everyone's cup.

The production quality of the film are deliberately low and the actors' performance falls into the category of unreliable. In the middle with mediocre performances Steve Guynn shines through with his excellent performance. In fact, he is realizing his character instead of merely reciting scripts. It's a rare gem of real acting in the sea of over-the-top performances.

Shark Puppets and Bonkers Plotlines

"Sharks of the Corn" shows its low-budget inclination with the use of cheap effects which have some charm. The majority of the shark attacks are hilariously performed by hand puppets. These add the illusion of a certain absurdity the film. A bizarre storyline that centers around a shark cult's plan for reviving a legendary shark goddess this is where the film has its greatest fun. The problem is that this creative thinking often cannot translate into an engaging enjoyment.

Amateurish Cinematography, Explosions Optional

The one area in which "Sharks of the Corn" misses the mark is in cinematography. The frame and the visuals come across as amateurish, lacking the sharpness and elegance that you find in mainstream horror films. While it's possible that this was done to keep the budget-friendly aesthetic, it does impact the overall quality of your viewing experience.

To conclude "Sharks of the Corn" isn't a popular choice for those who want to try it. It's slow and boring sequence of events that can become difficult to discern the significance of. The film's low production costs complicated plot lines, and unreliable acting could turn off people looking for a more smooth horror/comedy. Even for (click blogs) those interested in low-quality entertainment films "Sharks of the Corn" falls short of delivering the anticipated hilarity.

Final Rating: One "Stock Footage Overlay" Out of Five

Due to its poor quality video, narration, actors and editing "Sharks of the Corn" will not be able to meet the mark. In spite of the possibility for a riotously fun spoof film, the film fails to create a seamless and entertaining story. In my capacity as a reviewer, I close with a humorous review: movies like corn, only get better in the event that you throw explosions. Unfortunately, "Sharks of the Corn" fails to make the grade.

Report this wiki page